Monday, July 26, 2010

Thank Senator Kohl For Increased Funding For Victim Services

Senate Appropriations Committee increased funding for lifesaving victim services


Thank Senator Kohl For Increased Funding For Victim Services


The Senate Appropriations Committee approved significant, needed increases to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) fund annual distribution (called the "cap") in the Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations bill. In this tough budget climate, these increases are a significant victory and a testament to your incredible advocacy on behalf of victims. Thanks to all who made calls, sent emails to Senator Kohl!


The VAWA total in the Senate Appropriations bill is $468 million, which is a $45-million increase over fiscal year 2010. Highlights include:

  • $207 million for states to fund services, training, officers, and prosecutors
  • $50 million for legal assistance for victims
  • $40 million for transitional housing
  • $30 million for sexual assault services

The VOCA cap was increased by $136 million, up to $841 million!

Of course, this is just one of the first steps in the process, so we must continue to act to secure these increases in the final bill!


What can you do now?


Call Sen. Kohl today and say:

  • Your name and the city and state you live in.
  • "Thank you so much for supporting increased funding for the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) in the Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations bill. Domestic and sexual violence victims in our community will be safer with these desperately needed resources."
  • "We urge you to work to preserve these increases in the final bill."


Sen. Kohl also sits on the Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over FVPSA and DELTA funding. Please also remind Sen. Kohl to:

  • Please support $150 million for the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (FVPSA) in the Labor-Health and Human Services (LHHS) Appropriations subcommittee bill.
  • Funding for Community Initiatives to Prevent Abuse/DELTA prevention grants, the National Domestic Violence Hotline, and other domestic violence programs is also very important.


Next Steps


This is one of the first steps in the process to secure funding increases. Watch this space for more information as the Appropriations bills move through the House Appropriations Committee, the full House and Senate and then to the President. We will call on you to make more calls as the process moves forward to ensure that these increases are maintained in the final bill.


Thank you for taking action to support this critical funding for victims of domestic violence! Your voices have made a difference in the lives of victims!


For more information, please email advocacy@nnedv.org.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Federal Court of Appeals Upholds Disarmament of Abusers

Yesterday, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the constitutionality of a federal law that prohibits individuals with misdemeanor convictions of domestic violence from owning firearms. Steve Skoien, a repeat batterer from Rock County, Wisconsin, challenged the validity of the federal statute after he was convicted for possessing a gun while on probation for a domestic violence offense. The Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WCADV) praised the court of appeals’ important ruling.

“The 7th Circuit's decision means victims and law enforcement officers in Wisconsin will continue to be protected by laws that keep guns out of the hands of abusers,” said Patti Seger, executive director of WCADV. “Numerous studies show victims are much more likely to be killed when abusers have access to guns.”

Opponents of gun restrictions argued the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision, United States v. Heller, rendered gun laws—like those applying to domestic abusers—unconstitutional. The 7thCircuit relied on language in the Heller decision that indicated these laws are constitutional.

The court wrote, “If...disqualification to non-violent felons (embezzlers and tax evaders, for example) is presumptively constitutional, as Heller said..., it is difficult to condemn [the law restricting abusers' access to guns], which...is limited to violent crimes."

The court also ruled that “logic and data establish a substantial relation between” the law and the goal of preventing repeat domestic violence homicides. It noted, “The presence of a gun in the home of a convicted domestic abuser is strongly and independently associated with an increased risk of homicide.
Researchers have concluded that an abused woman is six to eight times more likely to be killed if a gun is in her home.”

The Supreme Court recently held the core of the second amendment allows law-abiding citizens to protect themselves in their homes,” said Seger. “Domestic abusers by definition have injected violence in the home and put their families at risk. Just as law-abiding citizens have a right to own a gun for self-defense in their homes, domestic violence victims have the right to be free in their homes from the terror and increased risk of death that comes when abusers have guns.”

Seger said the 7th Circuit’s decision should spur policymakers to better enforce the restrictions. Last legislative session two bills would have improved the ability of Wisconsin police to enforce the laws. The bills did not pass the state senate.

“Between 2000-2008, 156 Wisconsinites have been killed by domestic abusers who had easy access to guns,” Seger continued. “Some of these victims might still be alive if current gun restrictions were vigorously enforced. The court's decision confirms that our legislators and elected officials should act decisively to keep guns out of the hands of violent abusers.”